JUSTIÇA ADMINISTRATIVA: O FUTURO DOS TRIBUNAIS BRASILEIROS

Patrícia Dorigoni Hartmann

JUSTIÇA ADMINISTRATIVA: O FUTURO DOS TRIBUNAIS BRASILEIROS

Authors

Patrícia Dorigoni Hartmann TJRS - Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul

Abstract

ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE: THE FUTURE OF BRAZILIAN COURTS

ÁREA(S): processo civil; direito constitucional; direito comparado.

RESUMO: O artigo pretende demonstrar que no atual cenário social brasileiro o Poder Judiciário não mais pode ser responsável, de forma exclusiva, pela resolução dos conflitos, impondo-se a efetiva participação do Poder Executivo no sistema de adjudicação de justiça.

ABSTRACT: This paper aims to demonstrate that in our current society the judiciary branch cannot be alone responsible for the system of justice adjudication, and that the active participation of the executive branch in granting some sort of administrative adjudication is critical.

PALAVRAS-CHAVE: resolução extrajudicial de conflitos; agências reguladoras; doutrina da exaustão dos remédios administrativos e comportamento judicial.

KEYWORDS: administrative adjudication; regulatory agencies; theory of exhaustion of administrative remedies, judicial behavior.

SUMÁRIO: Introdução; 1 Um panorama do acervo de processos judiciais que aguardam julgamento; 2 Agências reguladoras; 3 Doutrina da exaustão dos remédios administrativos; 4 Um passo em direção à colaboração institucional; Conclusão; Referências.

SUMMARY: Introduction; 1 An overview of the Brazilian judiciary docket; 2 The regulatory agencies; 3 The theory of exhaustion of administrative remedies; 4 A step towards institutional collaboration; Conclusion; References.

Author Biography

Patrícia Dorigoni Hartmann, TJRS - Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul

Juíza de Direito de entrância intermediária do Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Rio Grande Sul.  Master of Laws (LLM) pela Universidade de Columbia/EUA, havendo recebido a distinção acadêmica Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar (2016-2017). Membro integrante do International Judicial Traning Program in Judicial Administration no Dean Rusk Center da University of Georgia/EUA, em dezembro/2014.  Participou do curso Introduction to Common Law Analysis and Language, da Pennsylvania State University/EUA, em junho e julho/2015. Concluiu o Nível 1 (módulos 1, 2 e 3) do Curso de Formação de Formadores da Escola Nacional de Formação de Magistrados- ENFAM, em 2018. Graduada em Ciências Jurídicas e Sociais pela Universidade Federal de Pelotas/RS, em 2005.

References

AMAR, Akhil Reed. America’s Unwritten Constitution (Basic Books eds., 2012).

ANTHONY, Robert A. The Supreme Court and the APA: Sometimes They Just Don’t Get It, 10 Adm. L.J. AM. U. 1 (1996).

BAUM, Lawrence. Judges and their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior (Princeton University Press eds., 2006).

BICKEL, Alexander. The Least Dangerous Branch (Yale University Press eds., 1986).

BOBBIT, Philip. Constitutional Fate: Theory of the Constitution (Oxford University Press eds., 1984).

BREST, Paul. Processes of Constitutional Decision-making: Cases and Materials (Wolters Kluwer Law & Business eds., 2015).

BREYER, Stephen G. & Richard B. Stewart. Administrative Law and Regulatory Policy (Aspen Casebooks, 8th ed., 2006).

BYSE, Clark, and Walter Gellhorn. Administrative Law- Cases and Comments, (The Foundation Press Inc. eds., 9th ed., 1995).

CALABRESI, Guido. A Common Law for the Age of Statutes (Harvard University Press eds., 1982).

COASE, R. H. The Problem of Social Cost, III The J. L. and Econ. 1 (1960).

CRAMTON, Roger C. The Doctrine of Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Michigan, 44 Mich. State Bar J. 10 (1965).

DAVIS, Kenneth Culp. Administrative Law Treatise (K.C. Davis Pub. Co., 2nd ed., 1978).

DUFFY, John F. Administrative Common Law in Judicial Review, 77 Tex. L. Rev., p.114-214 (1998).

FARHANG, Sean. The Litigation State, Public Regulation and Private Lawsuits in the U.S. (Princeton University Press eds., 2010).

FRANK, Jerome. Law and the Modern Mind (Anchor Books edition, 1963).

FUCHS, Ralph F. Prerequisites to Judicial Review of Administrative Agency Action, 51 Ind. L. J. 817 (1976).

HART AND WECHSLER’S, The Federal Courts and the Federal System (Foundation Press eds., 6th ed., 2009).

HORWITZ, Morton J. The Transformation of American Law (Yale University Press eds., 1977).

JAFFE, Louis L. Judicial Control of Administrative Action (Little, Brown and Company eds., 1965).

LEE, Thomas R. Stare Decisis in Economic Perspective: an Economic Analysis of the Supreme Court’s Doctrine of Precedent, 78 N.C. L. Rev. 643 (1999).

MACCORMICK, D. Neil, with Robert S. Summers and Arthur L. Goodhart, Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative Study. Applied Legal Philosophy Series (Routledge Publisher, 2016).

POSNER, Richard A. Judicial Behavior and Performance: an Economic Approach, 32 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 1259 (2005).

SCALIA, Antonin. A Matter of Interpretation (Princeton University Press, 1997).

SCHWARTZ, Bernard The Administrative Agency in Historical Perspective, 36 Ind. L. J. 263 (1961).

TRIBE, Laurence H. American Constitutional Law (Foundation Press eds., 3rd ed., 2010).

JUSTIÇA ADMINISTRATIVA: O FUTURO DOS TRIBUNAIS BRASILEIROS