LIBERTAD CONTRACTUAL, LIBERTAD RELIGIOSA Y PRINCIPIO DE NO DISCRIMINACIÓN: REFLEXIONES DESDE LA EXPERIENCIA DEL COMMON LAW

Francesca Benatti

LIBERTAD CONTRACTUAL, LIBERTAD RELIGIOSA Y PRINCIPIO DE NO DISCRIMINACIÓN: REFLEXIONES DESDE LA EXPERIENCIA DEL COMMON LAW

Authors

Francesca Benatti Università degli Studi di Padova (UNIPD), Itália. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1456-7812

Abstract

El ensayo examina la evolución del principio de no discriminación a la luz de la experiencia estadounidense. Se examinan en particular las decisiones en los asuntos Masterpiece y Creative 303. Se señala cómo una resolución cuidadosa del conflicto entre libertades fundamentales sólo puede partir de una valoración de la persona en un sentido ontológico-relacional, teniendo en cuenta los matices del caso concreto.

Author Biography

Francesca Benatti, Università degli Studi di Padova (UNIPD), Itália.

Profesora de Derecho Privado Comparado (UNICATT, Milano, Italia). Doctora por la Università degli Studi di Milano (2008). Profesora ordinaria da Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Milano. Tiene experiencia en Derecho. Atualmente é professore associato da Università degli Studi di Padova.

References

ALPA, G. Il diritto di essere se stessi. La Nave di Teseo Editore spa, 2021.

BERNSTEIN, D. Rehabilitating Lochner: Defending Individual Rights against Progressive Reform, Cambridge University Press, 2011.

BALKIN, J. M. The constitution of status. Yale LJ, 106, p. 2313, 1996.

CARAPEZZA FIGLIA, G. The prohibition of discrimination as a limit on contractual autonomy. Italian LJ, 4, p. 91, 2018.

COLLINS, H. The vanishing freedom to choose contractual partner. Law and Contemporary Problems, 76(2), p. 71, 2013.

COTTA, S. Perché il diritto?, SEI, 2023.

EPSTEIN, R. A. The worst form of judicial minimalism – Masterpiece Cakeshop deserved a full vindication for its claims of religious liberty and free speech, disponibile presso http://www.scotusblog.com/2018/06/symposium-the-worst-form-of-judicial-minimalism-masterpiece-cakeshop-deserved-a-full-vindication-for-its-claims-of-religious-liberty-and-free-speech, Ultimo aceso:16 out. 2023, 2019.

ETTORE PERRIELLO, L. Discrimination based on sexual orientation and religious freedom in European contract law. Italian LJ, 4, p. 639, 2018.

GOULD, J. P. A Supreme Matter of Conscience: Lady Hale’s Engagement with Article 9 ECHR, Plymouth Law and Criminal Justice Review, p. 46, 2019.

HORNBY, G. A. Let Them Eat Cake: A Comparative Analysis of Recent British and American Law on Religious Liberty. Duq. L. Rev., 58, p.377, 2020.

HUTEN, N., L’instrumentalisation de la dignitè humaine dans le droit contemporain, en B. Dumont, M. Ayuso, D. Castellano, La Dignitè Humaine, Pierre Guillame de Roux, 2020.

KRICKOVA, L. (2022). Business owners’ religious objections to same-sex marriage: the american versus european perspective. ConLawNOW, 13(2), p. 62-73.

MANENT, P. Cours philosophie politique, Gallimard, 2001.

MCCONNELL, M. W. Why is religious liberty the first freedom. Cardozo L. Rev., 21, p. 1243, 1999.

MCCRUDDEN, C. Litigating Religions, Oxford University Press, 2018.

MIROCHA, L. A recent polish case law in the masterpiece cakeshop case perspective. Forum Prawnicze, 2018(2), p. 65-77, 2018.

NICOLUSSI, A., & Rusconi, C. Volti e risvolti della dignità umana: a settant’anni dall’art. 1 della costituzione tedescaVolti e risvolti della dignità umana: a settant’anni dall’art. 1 della costituzione tedesca. Jus, p. 3-61, 2019.

PIN, A. Balancing Dignity, Equality and Religious Freedom: A Transnational Topic. Ecclesiastical Law Journal, 19(3), p. 292-306, 2017.

POSSENTI, V. , Diritti umani. L’età delle pretese. Rubettino, 2017.

RAO, N. On the use and abuse of dignity in constitutional law. Colum. J. Eur. L., 14, p. 201, 2007.

RAO, N. Three concepts of dignity in constitutional law. Notre Dame L. Rev., 86, p. 183, 2011.

SEPPER, E. The role of religion in state public accommodations laws. Louis ULJ, 60, p. 631, 2015.

LIBERTAD CONTRACTUAL, LIBERTAD RELIGIOSA Y PRINCIPIO DE NO DISCRIMINACIÓN: REFLEXIONES DESDE LA EXPERIENCIA DEL COMMON LAW